- ML Study
- Learning Log
- 2016-05-31

First attempt at Kaggle's starter competition classifying Titanic passenger survivorship

Over the holiday weekend I wrapped up my first attempt at kaggle's competition that asks you to predict survivorship of titanic passengers. It's a perfect starter project as it has a mix of categorical and quantitative variables and a single binary output. There are a couple of hurdles in preprocessing the data (missing values, mapping categorical variables, etc) so making it most of the way through chapter 4 of Python Machine Learning was timely.

My solution was relatively quick and dirty; I simply dropped a couple of the variables that were mildly inconvenient to work with and didn't bother with any exploratory analysis, as I wanted to get to a working solution ASAP. So I tried out logistic regression, linear and non-linear SVM, decision tree and random forest models on my cleaned data and they all performed nearly the same. I split the provided training dataset into a 70/30 training/test split so that I could do some basic checks on overfitting; the tree based models indeed performed better on the training set than the test, but no worse on the test than logistic regression. I then made two solutions by using the trained logistic regression and random forest models and preprocessing function on the provided test dataset.

Random forest:

Logistic regression:

I now rank 3931st out of 4287 submissions to that competitionâ€”I think I can consider my ML sabbatical mission accomplished!

It has been fun though to get my feet wet. From reading around (but not peeking!) it seems that it should be possible to get closer to 80%, and many suspect that those who score much higher are cheating and looking at the full dataset.

I've gotten started on a follow up attempt where I hope to get into the high 70s.